Visual Field Test Results: How to Read Your Glaucoma Report (MD, PSD, VFI and GHT)

Blog

Visual Field Test Results: How to Read Your Glaucoma Report (MD, PSD, VFI and GHT)

October 31, 2026

A glaucoma visual field test report shows how well each tested spot in your vision saw small lights, compared with healthy people your age. Read it in order: check that the test was reliable, then look at the probability maps, then the summary numbers. These are MD (overall loss), PSD (how patchy the loss is), VFI (a percentage score) and the Glaucoma Hemifield Test [1].

One test rarely settles anything. Learning, fatigue and cataract can all shift results, so eye doctors look for patterns that repeat across several tests [2,3]. This guide covers reading the printout. For what to expect from each glaucoma test, see our guide to glaucoma tests: eye pressure, OCT and visual fields.

This article is general education. It cannot diagnose glaucoma or tell you whether your own test shows progression. Bring your report to your eye doctor, and do not change your drops based on a printout.

Key takeaways

  • Check reliability first. False positives (pressing when no light appeared) distort results most. Fixation losses matter least [4].
  • MD near 0 dB is normal for your age. A more negative MD means more overall loss, but cataract can lower it too [1,5].
  • PSD rises when loss is patchy, as in typical glaucoma. In very advanced loss, it can fall again [1].
  • VFI runs from 100% (normal) to 0% (no measurable field). It is not the percentage of your sight that remains [6,7].
  • "Outside normal limits" on the Glaucoma Hemifield Test supports, but does not prove, glaucoma [1,8].
  • Progression is judged over several tests. Experts recommend six fields in the first two years after diagnosis [2].

In this article

When to get urgent care instead of waiting for a field test

A visual field test tracks slow change, not sudden symptoms. A curtain or shadow over your vision, a burst of new floaters, flashes, sudden vision loss or severe eye pain needs care right away. Do not wait for your next scheduled test [9,10].

Call 911 for: sudden trouble seeing, especially with face drooping, arm or leg weakness, trouble speaking, confusion, or sudden dizziness. Any one of these can be a sign of a stroke [11].

Go to an eye doctor or emergency room right away for:

  • A dark shadow or "curtain" over part of your vision, many new floaters, or flashes of light. These can mean a retinal detachment [9].
  • Sudden, severe eye pain with blurred vision, rainbow halos, a red eye, nausea or vomiting. These are signs of acute angle-closure glaucoma [10].
  • A sudden loss of vision in one eye [10].

See our guide to eye emergencies for other warning signs.

What does a visual field test measure?

A visual field test, also called perimetry, maps how sensitive each part of your side and central vision is to light. You look at a central target and press a button when you see a small flash. Each eye is tested on its own, and the results are compared with healthy people your age [1,12].

Most glaucoma clinics use the Humphrey Field Analyzer [1]. Some flashes are too dim to see on purpose. About half the lights in a typical test are not expected to be seen, so missing many is normal [2]. With both eyes open, one eye can cover a blind spot in the other, so real loss can go unnoticed in daily life [12].

How to read a visual field test report, section by section

Most Humphrey reports share one layout. Read from top to bottom: test details, reliability, gray scale, deviation maps, Glaucoma Hemifield Test and global indices. The probability maps carry the most weight. The gray scale is the least reliable part [1].

  1. Test details (top). Date, eye (OD is right, OS is left), test pattern such as 24-2, and strategy such as SITA Standard. Comparisons work best when these stay the same [1,2].
  2. Reliability indices (upper left). Fixation losses, false positives and false negatives [1].
  3. Threshold values and gray scale. Raw sensitivity in decibels (dB), not adjusted for age [1].
  4. Total deviation map. How each spot compares with healthy people your age [1].
  5. Pattern deviation map. The same comparison after removing overall dimming, such as from cataract [1].
  6. Glaucoma Hemifield Test. A plain-text result comparing the upper and lower halves [1].
  7. Global indices (lower right). MD, PSD and VFI [1].

What do 24-2, 10-2 and 24-2C mean?

These names describe which spots are tested. The 24-2 pattern spaces points 6 degrees apart across the central field. The 10-2 packs 68 points, 2 degrees apart, into the central 10 degrees. The 24-2C adds 10 central points to the 24-2. Denser central testing can find small central defects that the 24-2 misses [13,14].

The 24-2 has only 12 points inside the central 10 degrees [13]. In a study of 775 eyes, the 10-2 found central defects in 40% of glaucoma-suspect eyes that looked normal on the 24-2 [14]. The 24-2C can flag a central cluster of loss, and the 10-2 maps it in more detail [15]. Switching patterns makes results harder to compare [2].

How do you know if a visual field test is reliable?

Check the three reliability indices. Fixation losses track how often your eye drifted from the center. False positives count presses when no light appeared. False negatives count missed lights that should have been bright enough to see. Common rules accept fixation losses and false negatives under 33% and false positives under 15% [1].

  • False positives matter most. In 10,262 fields, false positives raised MD, making fields look better than they were. Fixation losses had little effect [4].
  • False negatives rise with damage. They can mean inattention, but in advanced glaucoma they often reflect normal wobble in damaged areas [1].
  • Cut-offs are guides. Experts warn against automatic trust in the indices. Technician notes and lens-rim or eyelid artifacts also count [2]. The 15% false-positive cut-off may not suit the newer SITA Faster strategy [16].
  • The first test is often the worst. In newly diagnosed patients, MD improved by 2.8 dB on average from the first to the second test. Baselines should use more than one test [3].

What do the gray scale and probability maps show?

The gray scale shades your raw sensitivity, with darker areas meaning lower sensitivity. It is easy to look at but the least reliable part. The total and pattern deviation probability maps matter more, because they show which spots are unusual for your age [1].

The gray scale groups values in 5 dB steps, and older or cataract eyes look darker without glaucoma [1]. Experts advise against decisions based on gray-scale plots [2]. On the probability maps, darker symbols mark stricter levels, such as fewer than 5%, 2%, 1% or 0.5% of healthy eyes [17]. Doctors look for clusters of flagged points in an arc above or below center, matching the nerve fiber layout [12].

Total deviation shows all loss, including dimming from cataract or small pupils. Pattern deviation removes that general dimming. Loss on the total map but not the pattern map often points to cataract [1,12,17].

What does mean deviation (MD) mean on a visual field test?

Mean deviation (MD) is the average difference, in decibels, between your sensitivity and that of healthy people your age. An MD near 0 dB is normal. The more negative the MD, the more overall loss. Cataract and other clouding of the eye also lower MD [1,12].

The widely used Hodapp-Parrish-Anderson system stages glaucoma partly by MD [17]:

  • Early: MD better than about -6 dB.
  • Moderate: MD between about -6 and -12 dB.
  • Severe: MD worse than about -12 dB.

The full system also counts flagged points and checks the central 5 degrees [17]. In 158 eyes from a large trial, average MD improved from -13.2 to -11.9 dB after cataract surgery, while the deepest blind areas did not change [5]. That gain reflects clearer optics, not nerve repair. For tracking change, MD detected worsening sooner than VFI or PSD in one study [18].

What does pattern standard deviation (PSD) mean?

Pattern standard deviation (PSD) measures how uneven your field is. A normal field is smooth, so PSD is low. Glaucoma usually causes patchy loss, which raises PSD. A PSD flagged at P < 5% on two tests in a row meets one set of minimum criteria for glaucoma damage [1,17].

PSD does not simply climb as glaucoma worsens. In very advanced disease, loss can become so widespread that the pattern deviation map looks almost normal. PSD can then level off or fall while vision is worse [1]. Read PSD with MD, VFI and the maps.

What is the visual field index (VFI)?

The visual field index (VFI) is an age-adjusted percentage score of the visual field. A VFI of 100% means a normal field, and 0% means no measurable field. It gives more weight to central points and was designed to be less affected by cataract than MD [1,6].

VFI is not the share of your sight that remains. In one study, VFI looked more optimistic than eight experts' judgments in about half the eyes. Typical matches were MD -5 dB with VFI 91%, MD -10 dB with 76%, and MD -15 dB with 60%. VFI often stays at 100% in early damage, which can hide early change [7]. The VFI trend plot projects the current rate a few years ahead, assuming nothing changes [1].

What does the Glaucoma Hemifield Test mean?

The Glaucoma Hemifield Test (GHT) compares five zones in the upper half of your field with matching zones in the lower half. Glaucoma often harms one half more. Results read "Within normal limits," "Borderline" or "Outside normal limits," and sometimes "General reduction of sensitivity" or "Abnormally high sensitivity" [1,8].

  • Borderline: between the normal and abnormal ranges. It usually calls for repeat testing.
  • Outside normal limits: supports glaucoma when the optic nerve agrees. On at least two fields, it meets one staging system's minimum criteria [17].
  • General reduction of sensitivity: the whole field is dimmer, which can come from cataract or small pupils [1,12,17].
  • Abnormally high sensitivity: check the false positives, because pressing too often makes a field look better than it is [1,4].

A field defect must also match the optic nerve, because brain and retina problems can cause field loss too [12].

Visual field report terms at a glance

The "usual reassuring result" column is a general guide, not a pass mark for your own eye.

TermWhat it tells youUsual reassuring resultWorth asking about
Fixation lossesHow often the eye drifted off centerUnder 33%A high rate with an odd pattern [1,4]
False positivesPresses when no light appearedUnder 15%Any high rate, which makes the field look better [1,4]
False negativesMissed lights that should have been seenUnder 33%A high rate in an early or normal field [1]
Mean deviation (MD)Overall loss versus your age group, in dBNear 0 dBMore negative values, or a drop over time [1]
Pattern standard deviation (PSD)How patchy the field isLow, without a P flagA flagged value, or a fall in advanced loss [1]
Visual field index (VFI)Age-adjusted field score, 0% to 100%Close to 100%A falling trend over several tests [6]
Glaucoma Hemifield TestUpper versus lower halfWithin normal limitsBorderline or outside normal limits [1]
Pattern deviation mapLocal defects after removing general dimmingFew scattered flagsA cluster of flagged points in an arc [12]
Guided Progression AnalysisChange versus your baseline testsNo progression flag"Possible" or "likely" progression [1]

How do doctors tell if glaucoma is getting worse on visual field tests?

They compare a series of tests, not one. Event analysis asks whether points have dropped below your baseline by more than normal test-to-test wobble. Trend analysis plots MD or VFI over time to estimate a rate of change. Both need several reliable tests done the same way [1,2].

The Humphrey Guided Progression Analysis (GPA) uses your first two tests as a baseline. It flags "Possible progression" when at least three points worsen on two tests in a row. It flags "Likely progression" when the same points worsen on three tests in a row [1]. In a simulation of stable eyes, "possible progression" appeared falsely in 34% over five years, compared with 7% for "likely" [19]. "Possible" is a prompt to retest, not a verdict.

Experts recommend six field tests in the first two years after diagnosis, and more when risk is high [2]. Most people in routine care lose field slowly. In 2,324 glaucoma patients and suspects followed for about 7 years, the median MD change was -0.05 dB per year, with faster loss at older ages [20]. Our article on glaucoma as a nerve disease explains why loss can continue at normal pressure.

A sample visual field report, explained

Here is an invented right-eye 24-2 report. Fixation losses 2 of 15, false positives 3%, false negatives 5%. MD -4.2 dB, PSD 5.1 dB (P < 0.5%), VFI 93%, and GHT "Outside normal limits." The pattern deviation map shows flagged points in an arc above center.

This reads as a reliable test with an early, localized defect. MD better than -6 dB fits the early stage, and the high PSD and GHT result fit patchy loss [1,17]. Next, the doctor checks whether the arc matches the optic nerve and OCT and repeats on another test. If a later test shows MD -5.0 dB, that 0.8 dB drop alone does not prove progression, because results vary between tests [2].

Questions to ask about your visual field results

  • Was this test reliable, and does the loss match my optic nerve and OCT?
  • Is this stable, possible progression or confirmed progression?
  • Do I need a 10-2 test to look closely at my central vision?
  • Could cataract or a change in test settings explain a change?

Keep copies of full reports if you change doctors. For how field loss affects vision rules, see our guide to legal blindness and visual field criteria.

Where Netra Restoration Therapy (NRT) fits

Netra Restoration Therapy (NRT) is an integrative program used alongside, not instead of, care from your eye doctor. NRT cannot diagnose glaucoma or judge progression. It does not lower eye pressure, and it does not replace drops, laser or surgery. NRT has not been tested in controlled trials for glaucoma.

If you use any complementary care, judge field results by the same rules. Use the same machine and pattern, check reliability, allow for learning, and confirm changes on repeat tests [2,3]. Read about how NRT effectiveness should be evaluated.

Frequently asked questions

What is a normal visual field test result?

A normal result usually has reliable indices, an MD near 0 dB, a PSD without a significance flag and a VFI close to 100%. The Glaucoma Hemifield Test reads "Within normal limits." A few scattered flagged points are common in healthy eyes.

Can a visual field test be wrong?

Yes. Learning effects, fatigue, pressing too often, a drooping eyelid, a lens rim in the way or cataract can all change a result. That is why an abnormal test is usually repeated before conclusions are drawn.

Can cataracts affect a visual field test?

Yes. Cataract dims light across the whole field, which lowers MD and can trigger "General reduction of sensitivity." The pattern deviation map and VFI are less affected. MD often improves after cataract surgery, but that reflects clearer optics, not repaired nerve tissue.

How often should a visual field test be done for glaucoma?

It depends on your risk and how stable your glaucoma is. Experts suggest six tests in the first two years after diagnosis to set a baseline and catch fast change. After that, stable patients are often tested less often, as their doctor advises.

What does "borderline" mean on a visual field test?

On the Glaucoma Hemifield Test, "Borderline" means the upper and lower halves differ a little more than usual, but not enough to be outside normal limits. It is not a diagnosis. It usually means repeat testing and a close look at the optic nerve.

Is VFI the percentage of vision I have left?

No. VFI is an age-adjusted score of the tested field in one eye, weighted toward the center. It does not measure both eyes together, reading ability or how much sight remains, and it can look more optimistic than experts' judgments.

Can visual field loss from glaucoma be reversed?

No. Glaucoma damage to the optic nerve is permanent, so true field loss does not come back. A test can look better because of learning, cataract surgery or normal variation. Treatment aims to stop or slow further loss.

Related reading

References

Sources checked October 31, 2026.

  1. Alencar LM, Medeiros FA. The role of standard automated perimetry and newer functional methods for glaucoma diagnosis and follow-up. Review, Indian J Ophthalmol, 2011. Read source
  2. Chauhan BC, Garway-Heath DF, Goñi FJ, et al. Practical recommendations for measuring rates of visual field change in glaucoma. Expert recommendations, Br J Ophthalmol, 2008. Read source
  3. Heijl A, Bengtsson B. The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma. Prospective study, Arch Ophthalmol, 1996. Read source
  4. Yohannan J, Wang J, Brown J, et al. Evidence-based criteria for assessment of visual field reliability. Retrospective study, Ophthalmology, 2017. Read source
  5. Koucheki B, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Patel G, Gaasterland D, Caprioli J. Visual field changes after cataract extraction: the AGIS experience. Clinical study, Am J Ophthalmol, 2004. Read source
  6. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. Development and cohort study, Am J Ophthalmol, 2008. Read source
  7. Artes PH, O'Leary N, Hutchison DM, et al. Properties of the Statpac visual field index. Longitudinal study, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2011. Read source
  8. Asman P, Heijl A. Glaucoma Hemifield Test: automated visual field evaluation. Methods paper, Arch Ophthalmol, 1992. Read source
  9. National Eye Institute. Retinal detachment. Patient education page, updated 2025. Read source
  10. MedlinePlus Medical Encyclopedia (National Library of Medicine). Glaucoma. Patient education page, reviewed 2024, updated 2025. Read source
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Signs and symptoms of stroke. Public health page, 2026. Read source
  12. Broadway DC. Visual field testing for glaucoma: a practical guide. Education article, Community Eye Health, 2012. Read source
  13. Durmuş EBŞ, Özkan K, Şahin HK, Özdere M. Comparison of 24-2 and 24-2C visual field testing in eyes with ocular hypertension. Clinical study, Medicina (Kaunas), 2026. Read source
  14. De Moraes CG, Hood DC, Thenappan A, et al. 24-2 visual fields miss central defects shown on 10-2 tests in glaucoma suspects, ocular hypertensives, and early glaucoma. Prospective cross-sectional study, Ophthalmology, 2017. Read source
  15. Phu J, Kalloniatis M. Comparison of 10-2 and 24-2C test grids for identifying central visual field defects in glaucoma and suspect patients. Prospective cross-sectional study, Ophthalmology, 2021. Read source
  16. Tan JCK, Yohannan J, Ramulu PY, et al. Visual field testing in glaucoma using the Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm (SITA). Review, Surv Ophthalmol, 2025. Read source
  17. Shirodker SSS, Meethal NSK, Mazumdar D, Asokan R. Performance of perimetric glaucoma staging systems and their preference patterns among Indian eye care practitioners. Cross-sectional study with staging criteria supplement, Indian J Ophthalmol, 2024. Read source
  18. Gardiner SK, Demirel S. Detecting change using standard global perimetric indices in glaucoma. Cohort study, Am J Ophthalmol, 2017. Read source
  19. Wu Z, Medeiros FA. Comparison of visual field point-wise event-based and global trend-based analysis for detecting glaucomatous progression. Simulation study, Transl Vis Sci Technol, 2018. Read source
  20. Chauhan BC, Malik R, Shuba LM, et al. Rates of glaucomatous visual field change in a large clinical population. Retrospective cohort study, Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 2014. Read source

This article provides general education and does not replace an individual eye examination, diagnosis or treatment plan. Sudden vision loss, a new curtain or shadow, a burst of new floaters or flashes, or severe eye pain needs emergency care right away, not a routine field test.

More From the Blog